Why asp.net mvc




















Declaratively define validation rules, using C attributes, which are applied on the client and server. Simply route requests to controller actions, implemented as normal C methods.

Data from the request path, query string, and request body are automatically bound to method parameters. Dig deeper: Controllers with ASP. The Razor syntax provides a simple, clean, and lightweight way to render HTML content based on your view.

Dig deeper: Views with ASP. If we didn't want to use ASP. Net controls we used standard html controls. We could even interrogate the Response object if we didn't want to use ASP. Now someone in their great wisdom probably someone who never programmed classic ASP has decided it's time to go back to the days of mixing code with content and call it "separation of concerns".

Sure, you can create cleaner html, but you could with classic ASP. To say "you are not programming correctly if you have too much code inside your view" is like saying "if you wrote well structured and commented code in classic ASP it is far cleaner and better than ASP. If I wanted to go back to mixing code with content I'd look at developing using PHP which has a far more mature environment for that kind of development. If there are so many problems with ASP. NET then why not fix those issues?

Last but not least the new Razor engine means it is even harder to distinguish between html and code. At least we could look for opening and closing tags i. It might be time to move to PHP and wait another 10 years for someone to separate code from content once again.

If you're working with other developers, such as PHP or JSP and i'm guessing rails - you're going to have a much easier time converting or collaborating on pages because you wont have all those 'nasty' ASP. NET events and controls everywhere. The problem with MVC is that even for "experts" it eats up a lot of valuable time and requires lot of effort.

Businesses are driven by the basic thing "Quick Solution that works" regardless of technology behind it. WebForms is a RAD technology that saves time and money. Anything that requires more time is not acceptable by businesses. Biggest single advantage for me would be the clear-cut separation between your Model, View, and Controller layers.

It helps promote good design from the start. It was a flop. We did a large project 4 developers, 2 designers, 1 tester with UIP back then and it was a sheer nightmare. Don't just jump in to bandwagon for the sake of Hype. All of the advantages listed above are already available in Asp.

Net With more great tweaks [ New features in Asp. Net 4 ] in Asp. Net 4. If your development team or a single developer families with Asp. Net just stick to it and make beautiful products quickly to satisfy your clients who pays for your work hours. MVC will eat up your valuable time and produce the same results as Asp. Net Why do you call partial postback as "nonsense"? This is the core feature of Ajax and has been utilized very well in Atlas framework and wonderful third party controls like Telerik.

I agree to your point regarding the viewstate. But if developers are careful to disable viewstate, this can greatly reduce the size of the HTML which is rendered thus the page becomes light weight. NET Web Form model and not pure html controls. Whatever it may be, why are you so worried if the renaming is done? I know you want to deal with lot of javascript events on the client side but if you design your web pages smartly, you can definitely get all the id's you want.

Even ASP. This is not a justification of why we need an MVC pattern. Again, why are you bothered with AXD Javascript? Why does it hurts you?

This is not a valid justification again. So far, i am a fan of developing applications using classic ASP. NET Web forms. For eg: If you want to bind a dropdownlist or a gridview, you need a maximum of 30 minutes and not more than 20 lines of code minimal of course.

But in case of MVC, talk to the developers how pain it is. Any body can answer this question? Web forms also gain from greater maturity and support from third party control providers like Telerik. In webforms you could also render almost whole html by hand, except few tags like viewstate, eventvalidation and similar, which can be removed with PageAdapters.

Nobody force you to use GridView or some other server side control that has bad html rendering output. Next is forced separation of concern. It's just separation of view, which can be done also in webforms MVP pattern for example.

A lot of things that people mentions for mvc can be done in webforms, but with some additional effort. Also the MVC pattern I feel make the code easier to maintain, esp.

Testing for small sites is not an issue, neither are the design advantages when a site is coded properly anyway, MVC in many ways obfuscates and makes changes harder to make.

Portability can significantly reduce cost for web development. NET Core allows moving apps easily between servers and be independent of any single service provider. A different number of developers can work on the application at the same time.

NET web application development was popular for a long time thanks to the reliability and stability of the technology. But today, the framework is no longer in support. It was replaced by up-to-date ASP. NET Core that offers developers a lot of advantages. NET Core has significantly improved performance and scalability. It supports cross-platform development and needs less code and maintenance.

Web applications that were built on ASP. NET Core are more secure and easily portable. If you want to utilize ASP. We are certified developers with good experience in web development and ready to use our knowledge for your project.

To find out more about Abto Software expertise, request a quote or get a demo of your custom solution. Content: 1. What is ASP. The most recent information about web app development within. Publisher Name. Related Content. Contact Us To find out more about Abto Software expertise, request a quote or get a demo of your custom solution. How did you hear about us? This site uses cookies to offer you better services.

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. Your use of Abtosoftware website is subject to these policies. Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.

We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent.

You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. One main benefit of ASP. Also, ASP. NET lends itself more towards pure browser coding of controls and usage of jQuery, true seperation of concerns. Things are more cumbersome with the old ASP.

NET server controls. Net web framework today, I would most certainly go for ASP. Net MVC mainly due to the benefits pointed out in the excellent post by Rajesh. But, if I were to choose any web framework not limited to. Net , I would probably use Rails or Django as they seem to me to be far easier to work with. Good Luck! I would continue to use Webforms. In my opinion, the question is becoming blurred with a lot of the cool features of MVC making their way into Webforms.

NET 4. NET Webforms? There are various positive points to moving towards MVC 1. TDD support out of the box as most of the design is based on interfaces. NET 4 as well 3. No ViewState this may seem a bit of moving backward to some , but overall a good design decision.

You can add your own controller with IOC, switch view engines at will, control model binding at wish etc.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000