What is the difference between matthew and luke in the bible




















It is the first book in the New Testament. Matthew shows Jesus as a messiah of Jewish people. Matthew was writing for Jews. Matthew quotes from Old Testament a lot and sends the message to have faith in the Old Testament. Luke deals with the description very delicately. The first chapter says about the announcement of the forthcoming birth of Jesus. He says that Joseph and Mary were a betrothed couple who did not live together. And in both cases the birth is of divine will. This sets up a series of miraculous births.

The gospel of Luke divides history into three periods: Israel, Jesus, and the church. This division of history occurs in no other gospel and so powerful is the Lucan mythological creation that it appears to us as natural. The Septuagint style greatly facilitates this model. This section contains a number of canticles, perhaps better referred to as psalms, because this is what they are emulating. Yet this very Jewish sounding and looking story takes place within the context of the Roman imperium.

The Roman empire keeps erupting into the surface of the story, sometimes obviously, at other times implicitly. The mention of Herod, king of Judea the Jews—either translation is correct , brings the empire into play.

Herod was a client king and his initial patron was Mark Anthony and the Roman senate. Roman power enabled him to defeat his rival Antigonus who had the support of the Parthians.

He built the sea port Caesarea Maritima notice the name , the fortress at Masada, and a new and magnificent temple in Jerusalem. This building program had the negative effect of raising taxes, but the positive effect of putting many people to work.

It is not quite clear when his reign begins probably bce or when he dies between 4 bce and 1 ce. His reputation is also ambivalent. Josephus is of a mixed mind, positive in his early writing, more negative in his later. Matthew is very negative, while Luke passes no judgement. Peter Richardson, Herod King of the Jews and Friend of the Romans , suggests that it depends upon your point of view. In all likelihood, Herod was no worse than the average Hellenistic king, i. Facebook Twitter Email.

The difference between the four gospels. Dave Rogers Carlsbad Current-Argus. Show Caption. Hide Caption. Gospel singers Mary Mary still going strong after 18 years. He is foretelling the future, per se to His disciples. Jesus is saying that most people will not realize who the Son of Man is until it is too late. Just like in the days of Noah and Lot, there will be death and destruction and only those who know God and give their life to Him will be saved.

This verse and whole passage has nothing to do with Jesus' character, but rather, what will happen on the day the Son of Man is revealed. I hope this clarification is helpful for you!

Answer: There is no difference between the two. The wording is different sure, it's written by two different authors so that is to be expected. However, the story is still the same. Jesus is baptized by John in the Jordan. It's common knowledge where John was preaching and baptizing others, so it's not necessary for Luke to include that information. The stories are still the same, even if Luke doesn't specifically state the location of the baptism or who performed it.

As Jesus was coming up out of the water, he saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove. And a voice came from heaven: 'You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased. Luke "When all the people were being baptized, Jesus was baptized too. And as he was praying, heaven was opened and the Holy Spirit descended on him in bodily form like a dove. Question: What are the similarities and differences between the Resurrection stories in Matthew and John?

Answer: John's account is longer than Matthew's and he focuses on Mary Magdalene and a select few of the disciples, where Matthew focuses on the conversations that happen at the tomb and with Jesus. You can find an indepth discussion about the Resurrection and how each gospel describes the series of events on my other article here. Matthew has 28 chapters, Luke has 24, John has 21, and Mark is the shortest gospel by far with only 16 chapters.

Your research provides relevant and detailed content. It offers clarity and pertinent references of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. I am very impressed with all the Biblical research you have included in your posts. I find it very beneficial. Thank you so much for explaining the gospels. I started reading psalms then proverbs and went to John and was trying to figure out where to go next in the bible and read. Your information helped me a lot. Hi Cholee, i just started a course in theology level 1, and my research led me to you.

I was glued to the information on synoptic gospels and other suff i found. Well written, clearly understood, well answered questions. I have learned a lot , thank you. Thank you for such an informative, easy to understand article. I have been trying to learn more about the gospel of John and this was really helpful! Excellent article.

I like the way you went into depth about the Gospels and the men who wrote them. It was interesting to learn John was the only writer of the Gospel who knew Our Lord. Thanks for a lot of useful information on a very interesting topic. I am very encouraged by seeing your hard work may God bless you and give you wisdom to know Him more. Nicely done. I would have liked for your article to have been a bit longer Nonetheless, your hub gives us a good overview of all gospels; it piques the attention so that we want to know more.

I loved your graph! Voting Interesting. Glad you found new information KJhusak. I think the background of each gospel is a great way to help put the events in place. Marine Biology. Electrical Engineering. Computer Science.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000